Politics Weekend Posting
Here is the weekend political posting. Keep on sharing all your thoughts.
I hope you all have a great weekend.
Hello IRISH,
That is a good question …… I was looking for it LAST Night…..did not find a thing…. yet….
Hi Jerry …. Strange i looked this morning , nothing ….. Perhaps Chartster might know , as he has been following the case. Its an important case if my knowledge of it is correct.
Hello Irish………….. You are CORRECT……. IT IS A BIG ONE…… “OATH OF OFFICE”
I pointed it out yesterday… from a Rumble post…
IRISH………
I was hearing last night,….. there might be a difference on the “case”…..
Rather than the case being targeted at the CONGRESS ,… it was being targeted at Three
SCOTUS justices.
I do not know exactly,… so, I will keep ears open, and let you know ,if I hear anything….
Good morning.
I have heard nothing regarding Brunson. I must say, I’m a bit disappointed about it. However, I do know it’s a timing thing.
There are several things that make this case the biggest of all time. I’ll speak of two points as I understand them.
1. The fifth pillar of the first amendment is redress of grievances or right to petition the government.
We the People have not been able to execute that right due to the corporation and BAR law or admiralty law.
This decision will bring back the right to petition the government at all levels, county, city and state.
We the People can take our county back legally removing corrupt public officials. (HUGE)
2. The judges that sided against Brunson (4 of them I would imagine) have just gone against the constitution and can, and probably will be removed.
This sends shockwaves across every court in the land and the judges will be put on notice.
It removes the BAR and goes back to common law.
And the case will remove Biden, Harris and 380 members of Congress,, effective immediately!
And that puts every elected official on notice.
Adhere to the constitution or hit the road.
Yes…………… that is WHY THE CASE IS HUGE……
WE HAVE A CORRUPT GOVT…. since 1871….
Since this effects the rulers ( elite banking cabal families from the hang over of the CROWN)….
. it will be up to WE THE PEOPLE…. to return to a REPUBLIC… not MOB RULE DEMOCRACY….
“We Jëws have put issue upon issue to the American people. Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns. With their eye’s fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind every scene. We Jëws toy with the American public as a cat toys with a mouse.” — H@rold W@ll@ce Rosenth@l
Trump can’t win – the sequel.
THAT WAS FUNNY…………… 🙂
The CLIMATE FRAUD
.
https://rumble.com/v5s34pz-trump-a-wrecking-ball-for-climate-change-fraud-alex-newman.html
.
CO2 is plant food.
.
For the first time in almost a hundred years, physicist believe they can determine the shape of a photon.
.
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.203604
.turns out the shape may depend on its environment.
More news on vaccines……
.
episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, Hollywood actor Josh Brolin, shared his personal health scare involving a diagnosis of Bell’s palsy, which host Joe Rogan suggested might be linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
.
Expert agencies and elected legislatures
https://pluralistic.net/2024/11/21/policy-based-evidence/
ANYBODY HEARD……….. anything about BRUNSON CASE…….??????????
They deliver crap on FRIDAY… and hope nobody remembers… over the weekend… 🙂
Majority of SHeeple have the memory span of about 8 sec…… ……………….. 🙂
there were no surprises in the Brunson case. The Supreme Court denied the petition for rehearing. There are those who said the case had the potential to overturn the 2020 Presidential election and reinstate Trump. They were wrong. It had no potential.
SCOTUS may be majority conservative, but they are not going to stick their necks out if they don’t have to.
WHEN did they deny the petition ???????????
Seems to me…………. there is a LOT OF MISINFORMATION… concerning the CASE……
DO YOU HAVE ANY LINKS for all the info.. you are commenting on…… thanks…
2.or 3 days ago
SCOTUS denied the Raland Brunson case, which was the first one and needed different verbiage.
The Loy Brunson case is still there under title 11 status. It can be brought forward any time they want.
Remember, the court ( a clerk or judge ) gave the case title 11 emergency status.
The case is still there.
Rand Paul didn’t seem to get the Trump memo.
The Kentucky lawmaker spoke on CBS’ Face the Nation on Sunday, and firmly stated his stance against both tariffs and the potential of the military being involved in mass deportations.
Dumb ass…….PAUL……. we have been invaded…..
Hope his next door neighbor whips his ass…. again… 🙂
CFS………….. read….. where Tennessee is now invaded by Vennys. drug dealers……in all the major cities…
Last time I drove through Tenn… I stopped in Chattanooga… and reminded self … not to stop in the city again…
HOPE TRUMP CLEANS HOUSE… with the MILITARY… … 🙂
Areas of Nashville are disgusting……..c
Parked cars are often broken into.
Trump’s pick for surgeon general is terrible, she is so wrong about COVID vaccine.
She pushed Pfizer’s lies so hard.
Pfizer did give Trumpster $1million… I think, so, …… humm..
The “political” appointments are just a continuation of the swamping…(maybe.. 🙂 )
I just posted about Brunson. The comment nazi removed it.
Short story, it’s still there. Not been denied.
Raland Brunson was denied. Not the Loy Brunson case.
Then just post it again.
CFS,
Just saw this.
Chartster…..Please explain the motion of a long pendulum (Foucault’s pendulum) if the earth is not a spinning ball.
Perhaps you should explain the long pendulum being plumb. If the earth was moving every crane and long pendulum would be off plumb.
Get a hand held pendulum and ride in a car. The pendulum move opposite from the cars moving direction. So, IF the earth was moving ‘as the say’ then large cranes and long pendulums would show it. However, they don’t!
Thanks for pointing out the obvious.
Your pure ignorance, Chartster, borders on artistic lying.
Your “plumb motion” is a result of car acceleration and manifestation of simple Newton’s F=ma caused motion.
I.e. The acceleration of the car caused the motion..
Constant speed motion, e.g. in a plane, would not move the pendulum.
The point of the Foucault pendulum is that the plane which contains the motion of the pendulum does NOT STAY CONSTANT, but gradually rotates due to the coriolas effect of a rotating spherical earth.
Auto-correct to mis-spelling ?
Or did I mis-type ?
Either way it’s Coriolis effect
Your pure ignorance, Chartster, borders on artistic lying.
Your “plumb motion” is a result of car acceleration and manifestation of simple Newton’s F=ma caused motion.
I.e. The acceleration of the car caused the motion..
Constant speed motion, e.g. in a plane, would not move the pendulum.
The point of the Foucault pendulum is that the plane which contains the motion of the pendulum does NOT STAY CONSTANT, but gradually rotates due to the coriolis effect of a rotating spherical earth.
CFS,
You just proved stationary earth. Congrats!!🎉
Pete Hegseth: The Short Course
https://snyder.substack.com/p/pete-hegseth-the-short-course
Looks like the nuclear command chain is in a safe pair of hands
UNBELIEVABLE
IRS employees owe $450 million
In back taxes.
NO PENALTY RULE FOR THEM,
BUT SCREW US.
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9i4lnqGs3M
IRS agents know the game…. I think it was explained by Cynthia McKinney…… (I think that is the name)
Over 15 yrs ago…approx…
ONE BIG CON GAME…. I have explained this for YEARS….
Only an idiot would leave millions of dollars lying around unprotected…….
.
https://www.ladbible.com/news/uk-news/woman-threw-away-boyfriend-bitcoin-tip-search-988230-20241125
SO WHAT IS THE LATEST INFORMATION >>>>>>ON THE BRUNSON CASE…..
WHICH the SCOTUS… supposedly posted FRIDAY….NOV. 20?????????????
SOMETHING was suppose to be decided…………..according to the info…
THANKS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
PEEP>>> PEEP>>>>> PEEP…………………
HOW CLOSE TO NUCLEAR WAR . Scott Ritter is PISSED , & so he should be . It appears that Trump is picking the same sort of war hungry clowns , that he picked the last time , but there again , who is REALLY picking these people. A clue might be , that so far he !!!! ? has picked a whole bunch of Zionists.
Watch out people , it may turn out that you voted for a Trojen Horse who promised the American people that there would be no new wars , & we would have peace…… It would appear that the chartsters of this world , may have been shafted. …. Judge Nap ….. 39 minutes long.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1mCWo9_hCU&list=UUDkEYb-TXJVWLvOokshtlsw&index=2&pp=iAQB
TONY………….. IT WOULD NOT SURPRISE ME ONE BIT………………… THE TROJAN HORSE….
BILLIONAIRES are totally for themselves…..
We will see if, TRUMPSTER fooled the CHRISTIANS… like BUSH did …..
All men are SINNERS…. we will see just how much Trumpster lied to WE THE PEOPLE….
Keeping your enemies close is going to prove to be BS…….
If, so Trumpster just stepped in a pile of donkey poo…….on his way to Damascus
There might be some missile strikes in certain areas of Europe by Russia. Some strategic houses and castles might be a good thing.
Scare event necessary-Q
Non-nuclear
US adjusting nuclear deterrence strategy – Pentagon
Washington is developing a new version of the B61 gravity bomb and increasing the readiness of its nuclear submarines
The US will adjust its nuclear deterrence strategy to meet potential threats from Russia and China, according to a Pentagon report.
The Department of Defense said that “multiple nuclear peer adversaries challenge the US and its allies’ and partners’ security,” adding that those countries are growing and modernizing their nuclear arsenals.
In light of this, Richard Johnson, deputy assistant secretary of defense, singled out Russia and China, and noted that the US may need to adjust its 2022 Nuclear Posture Review to maintain nuclear deterrence. He noted, however, that current nuclear modernization effort may not be enough.
According to Johnson, to address those concerns, the Pentagon “has already taken steps to field capabilities to enhance nuclear deterrence and flexibility.” The key elements include the development of the B61-13 gravity bomb, and increased readiness of nuclear-armed and powered Ohio-class submarines.
The Pentagon announced the development of a new variant of the B61 bomb last October, saying that it would replace some of the older versions and provide the US with “additional options against certain harder and large-area military targets.” Meanwhile, Washington stressed that fielding the B61-13 “is not in response to any specific current event” and would not increase the overall nuclear stockpile.
The Ohio-class submarines are the key element of the US nuclear triad and are specifically designed for nuclear deterrence. They can be armed with Trident missiles with a range of up to 12,000 km.
In an unscheduled TV address, the Russian leader, Putin, said the Oreshnik missile could not be intercepted and promised to carry out more tests, including in “combat conditions”
current best information is that Russia only has 20-25 Oreshnik missiles in stock and is currently making them at a slow rate of only 10 per year.
The convention non-nuclear warhead has novel technology that makes it more devastating than any bomb the U.S. has, but the missile can also be tipped by a nuclear warhead.
For those that want the truth. Great documentary.
https://rumble.com/v5rx2jt-the-q-documentary-there-is-a-plan.html
Starting to look like Russia is well aware that Trumps picks are zionists loyal to Israel.
They are not expecting a poitive change when Trump takes office.
The massive Russian build up could end the conflict in Ukraine.
They are also preparing for nato troops moving into Ukraine.
Those that pray should focus on the western psychopaths not sending a nuke.
The fools are talking about sending nukes to Ukraine.
There won’t be nuclear war. There might be strategic missile strikes to make a clear point.
If you look at the shipping lanes in the North Sea, Black Sea and Baltic Sea, there is no threat of war.
All the ships are still going their thing. If there was a war about to happen, they all would have bugged out and gone to safe harbor.
You guys listen to too many shills on the Andrew (shill) Napalitano show. Common theme? It’s all Trumps fault!
Goofballs actually think it’s the Jews fault.. And too goofy to understand it’s the luciferian cabal that we are at war with. WTFU!
Ditto ……….. On …..there is NOT GOING TO BE ANY NUKE WAR…..
Big Phara needs the Sheeple for the Medical Warfare… , if, you kill everyone off, how are you going to
fleece them….. 🙂
Yep…………… WE ARE SCreWed….
MASK AND A JAB….. in the you know where….. 🙂
The COVID Cover-Up: 19 Questions We Must Answer
Tyler Durden’s Photo
by Tyler Durden
Tuesday, Nov 26, 2024 – 05:00 PM
Authored by Justin Hart via ‘Rational ground’ substack,
So here’s the deal – remember when “experts” kept telling us what to do during COVID?
Turns out they got pretty much everything wrong. Like, spectacularly wrong.
We’re talking 19 major things they completely screwed up, from how the virus spreads to whether masks actually work (spoiler alert: those cloth masks were basically fashion accessories).
Dr. Fauci is the patron saint of TERRIBLE COVID policies.
He was wrong on SO MANY POINTS. It’s time to set the record straight…
Did he get anything right?
Origin of the disease—wrong
Transmission—wrong
Asymptomatic spread—wrong
PCR testing—wrong
Fatality rate—wrong
Lockdowns—wrong
Community triggers—wrong
Business closures—wrong
School closures—wrong
Quarantining the healthy—wrong
Impact on youth—wrong
Hospital overload—wrong
Plexiglass barriers—wrong
Social distancing—wrong
Outdoor spread—wrong
Masks—wrong
Variant impact—wrong
Natural immunity—wrong
Vaccine efficacy—wrong
Vaccine injury—wrong
Last year the Norfolk Group just dropped a bomb of a document laying out all these failures. And it’s not just Monday morning quarterbacking – they’ve got the receipts. Real studies showing how natural immunity was actually legit (while Fauci pretended it didn’t exist), data proving schools could’ve stayed open (looking at you, Sweden), and evidence that maybe, just maybe, locking healthy people in their homes wasn’t the brilliant strategy they claimed.
Listen, I’m not here to say “I told you so” (okay, maybe a little), but we need to talk about this. Because if we don’t learn from how badly our “experts” messed up, we’re just asking for a repeat performance next time around. And honestly? I don’t think any of us can handle another round of plexiglass theater and double masking.
Let’s break down exactly how they got it wrong, and more importantly, why they kept doubling down even when the evidence said otherwise. Buckle up – this is gonna be a wild ride through the greatest public health face-plant in modern history.
These are the questions WE want answered!
TRANSMISSION
Why did officials insist on surface transmission protocols when evidence showed primarily respiratory spread?
Why weren’t hospitals evaluating transmission patterns early to inform policy?
Why did the CDC not conduct studies on actual transmission patterns in schools and workplaces?
Why was outdoor transmission overemphasized despite minimal evidence?
Why weren’t transmission studies prioritized to guide evidence-based policies?
ASYMPTOMATIC SPREAD
What evidence supported the claim that asymptomatic spread was a major driver?
Why did health officials emphasize asymptomatic spread without solid data?
Why were resources wasted testing asymptomatic people when they could have focused on symptomatic cases?
How did the emphasis on asymptomatic spread affect public trust when evidence didn’t support it?
What data actually existed on true asymptomatic (vs presymptomatic) transmission rates?
PCR TESTING
Why did the CDC insist on developing its own test rather than using WHO’s?
Why weren’t cycle threshold values standardized or reported?
Why did labs use cycle thresholds up to 40 when this led to false positives?
Why wasn’t PCR testing prioritized for high-risk populations early on?
How did high cycle thresholds affect case counts and policy decisions?
FATALITY RATE
Why were infection fatality rates not properly stratified by age from the beginning?
Why were deaths “with COVID” vs “from COVID” not distinguished?
How did inflated fatality rates affect public perception and policy?
Why weren’t accurate age-stratified fatality rates clearly communicated?
How did misrepresenting fatality rates affect public trust?
LOCKDOWNS
Why were lockdowns implemented without cost-benefit analysis?
Why were lockdown harms (mental health, delayed medical care, etc.) ignored?
What evidence supported the effectiveness of lockdowns?
Why weren’t less restrictive focused protection measures tried first?
How many excess deaths were caused by lockdown policies?
Why weren’t regional/seasonal factors considered in lockdown decisions?
COMMUNITY TRIGGERS
Why were arbitrary case numbers used to trigger restrictions?
Why weren’t hospital capacity metrics prioritized over case counts?
How were community trigger thresholds determined?
Why weren’t triggers adjusted based on actual risk levels?
Why weren’t clear exit criteria established for restrictions?
BUSINESS CLOSURES
What evidence supported closing small businesses while keeping large retailers open?
Why weren’t occupancy limits tried before full closures?
How many businesses were unnecessarily destroyed?
Why weren’t economic impacts weighed against minimal health benefits?
What data supported effectiveness of business closures?
SCHOOL CLOSURES
Why were schools closed despite early evidence of low risk to children?
Why did the US ignore data from European schools that stayed open?
Why weren’t the developmental/educational harms to children considered?
How did school closures affect mental health and suicide rates in youth?
Why weren’t teachers unions’ influence on closure decisions examined?
What evidence supported claims that schools were major transmission vectors?
QUARANTINING THE HEALTHY
Why was mass quarantine implemented without precedent or evidence?
Why weren’t focused protection measures tried instead?
What was the cost-benefit analysis of quarantining low-risk groups?
How did mass quarantine affect mental health?
Why weren’t vulnerable populations prioritized instead?
IMPACT ON YOUTH
Why weren’t developmental impacts on children considered?
How did isolation affect mental health and suicide rates?
What were the educational losses from remote learning?
Why weren’t sports/activities preserved for youth wellbeing?
How did masks/distancing affect social development?
What were the impacts on college students’ mental health and development?
HOSPITAL OVERLOAD
Why weren’t early treatment protocols developed to prevent hospitalizations?
Why were field hospitals built but never used?
How did “flattening the curve” messaging affect hospital preparations?
Why weren’t at-risk populations protected to prevent hospitalizations?
What was the actual vs projected hospital capacity usage?
PLEXIGLASS BARRIERS
What evidence supported effectiveness of barriers?
Why weren’t airflow patterns considered?
How did barriers affect ventilation?
What was the cost-benefit of barrier installation?
Why weren’t barrier recommendations updated when shown ineffective?
SOCIAL DISTANCING
What evidence supported 6-foot distancing?
Why wasn’t distancing adjusted based on ventilation/masks/context?
How did arbitrary distance rules affect businesses/schools?
Why wasn’t 3-foot distancing considered adequate earlier?
What research supported outdoor distancing requirements?
OUTDOOR SPREAD
Why were outdoor gatherings restricted despite minimal transmission risk?
Why were beaches/parks closed?
Why weren’t outdoor activities encouraged as safer alternatives?
How did outdoor restrictions affect mental/physical health?
What evidence supported masks outdoors?
MASKS
Why were mask mandates implemented without RCT evidence?
Why weren’t potential harms of masking children considered?
Why were cloth masks promoted despite ineffectiveness?
How did masks affect learning/development in children?
Why weren’t mask policies updated when studies showed limited benefit?
Why was natural immunity discounted in mask policies?
VARIANT IMPACT
Why were variants used to justify continued restrictions?
How did variant fears affect vaccine confidence?
Why weren’t policies adjusted for milder variants?
How did variant messaging affect public trust?
Why weren’t seasonal patterns considered in variant projections?
NATURAL IMMUNITY
Why was natural immunity ignored in policy decisions?
Why were recovered people required to vaccinate?
Why wasn’t natural immunity studied more thoroughly?
How did dismissing natural immunity affect public trust?
Why were natural immunity studies from other countries ignored?
VACCINE EFFICACY
Why were initial efficacy claims not properly qualified?
Why wasn’t waning efficacy communicated earlier?
How did overselling efficacy affect public trust?
Why weren’t breakthrough cases tracked properly?
Why were boosters promoted without clear evidence of benefit?
VACCINE INJURY
Why weren’t adverse events properly tracked/investigated?
Why were vaccine injuries downplayed or dismissed?
How did VAERS data interpretation affect public trust?
Why weren’t age-stratified risk-benefit analyses conducted?
Why weren’t early warning signals investigated more thoroughly?
How did dismissing injuries affect vaccine confidence?
We have a LOT of work to do and THANKFULLY we may have people in charge who are willing to ask these questions!
MAKES TRUMPSTER LOOK LIKE A DUMB ASS……………. with his CABINET SELECTS…
Jerry, I have said Trump was wrong about the COVID vaccine.
/
However, I don’t think he was wrong about ordering a speed up of creation of a vaccine.
A vaccine was needed, and could be needed for future diseases.
However, A SERIOUS ERROR IS MADE IN NOT TESTING PROPERLY.
New pharma MUST always be tested properly.
Further, it is immoral AND UNLAWFUL to mandate any un-tested vaccine.
IT WAS THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION THAT MANDATED VACCINATION.
Not Trump !
If anyone deserves to be in jail it is Fauci.
.
.
CFS………… thanks for the reply……………..
I posted the video…. above….. going over the CABINET MEMBERS…. (TRUMPSTER is selecting presently)
Who went along with the JAB… and PROMOTED THE JAB….
We all know about what harm the JAB has incurred…. so, why the SELECTION of those who
promoted a HARMFUL PRODUCT….. ?
FAUCI…………. should be TRIED for CRIMES against HUMANITY….. (we both agree on that one)
Well there you have it folks , Pete Hegseth will be working for Greater Isreal , but not for you. So far it appears that most of Trumps picks may be thinking the same way. These wimps including Trump will do whatever their owners tell them to do.
That is a GOOD ONE>……………………. CLUELESS……………… on Biblical info….
BRAIN DEAD BASTARD……… is a John Haggie hang over….
what really appalls me is the grip big pharma has on politicians by virtue of bribes (political donations)
Consider Ivermectin…….Fenbendazole and other very safe drugs, used for decades, which could be repurposed if research was performed.
.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5shGPTTTR8
if it was not bad enough to send ATACMS missiles to Ukraine, NATO political scum and Biden are allowing the use of land mines.
MISERABLE WAR CRIMINALS !
.https://podbay.fm/p/the-john-batchelor-show/e/1732587477
On 21 November, France, Germany and the UK (together known as the E3) had made a joint statement on Iran’s implementation of its nuclear commitments under the JCPOA, a multilateral agreement from 2015 under which under Iran had agreed to limit its nuclear activities including uranium enrichment and allow in international inspectors. In it, the E3 said Iran’s overall stockpile of enriched uranium was now “over 32 times the limit” it had committed to in the JCPOA. The E3 described Iran’s “choices and decisions regarding its nuclear activities” as the source of a “long-standing proliferation crisis”, a situation they said Iran had escalated “by further departing from its JCPOA commitments”.
And that, SUCKERS, is only about what inspectors were allowed to see !!!
Makes sense, Israel wants war with Iran.
What happened with the Brunson case ? , anybody know.