Hey guys, I can understand not agreeing with Goldfinger’s political points of view, but he is a regular guest here on the KE Report for his knowledge of commodities trading, charts, and fundamental analysis on resource stocks.

He’s the number 1 most followed contributor on Ceo.ca out of over a million users, has been speaking at conferences like the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference and Metals Investor Forum as a keynote speaker the last couple years. He is a successful newsletter writer, technician, and writer for Energy & Gold.

> There’s no reason to be taking swipes at him as “Goldtard,” even it you didn’t like his political point of view in the interview with Bob Moriarty (who is good friends with Robert Sinn aka Goldfinger and has a lot of respect for him as well which is why he’s on his show).

How about getting back to discussing investing and laying off the personal attacks.

Ex, Robert Sinn missed the point of the interview, you don’t interview someone to confirm your views you interview them to get their views. But when you open that door, you are also opening an insight into your character and as such it is open to discussion no matter what the person’s credentials are. If I didn’t agree with what Bob M said I would say so, that is what freedom of speech is all about. Political views whether we like them or not are also a big part of investing. DT

Hi DT. I agree with much of what you just wrote.
Where I was taking issue was the piling on with name calling like “clueless” and “Goldtard”. I don’t agree with Robert or many people politically that I like otherwise or in other areas of life, but he is a sharp guy, he’s a regular guest on this show, and he is a buddy of mine. If people don’t like his views, then that’s fine, but it could be done without calling him a Goldtard.

Ex, when I used the word “clueless” what I meant was that Goldfinger doesn’t have a broad understanding of the situation or the knowledge thereof. “Clueless” isn’t name calling in my dictionary. DT