Sean Brodrick – Investing Outlook For A.I., Defense, Uranium, Oil, Lithium, Copper, Steel, And Gold Stocks
Sean Brodrick, Editor of Wealth Megatrends and contributing analyst to Weiss Ratings Daily, joins me to look at how he’s managing his portfolio with regards to equities exposed to artificial intelligence, defense, uranium, oil, lithium, copper, steel, and gold.
We start off getting his take on the recent market jubilance from signals that the Fed has finally pivoted from the end of monetary tightening, to looking at rate cuts for next year. We then dive into a number of different megatrends and sectors, how he is seeing them playing out in the near-term to medium-term, and how he is rebalancing his portfolio accordingly.
.
Click here to follow along with Sean’s work at Weiss Ratings Daily
AG is up almost 40% vs NVDA in the last 5 weeks yet the real upside action hasn’t even begun.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=AG%3ANVDA&p=D&yr=0&mn=11&dy=0&id=p36808922703&a=1478484349
Tommy Humphreys – 100X Returns, 99% Losses, and a New View on Uranium Stocks
Resource Talks – 12/21/2023
“Tommy Humphreys is the founder of CEOca, a Canadian stock-focused website. This was a conversation about making money, losing money, and learning how to stay away from bad deals & bad people in the junior mining stocks.”
00:00 recap
01:10 what did Tommy do with the money from the sale?
07:40 how does Tommy “save” money?
09:10 what does Tommy consider “great returns”?
12:15 is timing the market a necessity in the junior space?
17:59 how much of Tommy’s portfolio is in the junior space?
19:20 can retail investors even compete in this market?
27:40 how do I get founders shares?
31:25 are private placements a necessity for retail investors?
34:30 how did Tommy’s 100 baggers work?
40:40 how can retail investors have an edge in this market?
43:25 how to know who to follow in the junior space?
52:49 what metrics does Tommy look at before buying something?
01:00:15 how does Tommy look at the geology on his companies?
01:03:15 how many stocks does Tommy own?
01:06:40 why is Tommy not invested in uranium?
01:21:20 who really makes the money in the junior space?
01:24:10 what are good vs bad newsletter writers?
01:34:20 what’s Tommy working on right now?
Tommy Humphreys interview is a must listen. Thanks.
Great interview, I also like the way that the interviewer Antonio Atanasv conducts an interview, he slides critical questions into the conversation at the right moment and doesn’t try to lead the conversation he lets it evolve in a natural way. I have watched him conduct other interviews and I like his style. The interviewer is very “personable”. DT
Getchell Gold had a hellava day. GGLDF, can’t find any news.
Second time this week the OTC and Schwab had the close for Benton Resources wrong. The actual CAD close was .17 yesterday which is .13 USD. Last night they US had it at .06 and Benton opened at +113%. Once could be an error. Twice implies possibly someone and their friends made over 100% on the sale at close and the buy at open. However for Benton…they made 200% this week. Second complaint filed with Schwab. (Doesn’t mean Schwab is the guilty party as it could be off shore or someone’s grandmother. But it should be checked.)
(My account shows a 4.59% gain today when it is only $200. Now I will have algo issues all day trying to knock my account back despite the good price of Gold at open)
Now, after 15 minutes it is -$40 subtracting out the false gain of Benton. Laugh if you want…I usually blame JD of JPM.
Marc
There is no loss by repetitively using an incorrect close, but if you believe in technical analysis and the you use the OTC price despite it being a possible “paint the tape” rather than the primary source (Canadian data), then your going to have distortions in the data that are read incorrectly by the algos, which are the life blood of Wall Street. Telling Schwab on the phone or in writing is moot as they respond to neither. It is not that the system doesn’t automatically correct by waiting for an another EOD, but it is the unknown factor of how fat-finger errors or painting the tape alters true performance, just like naked shorting. Naked shorting these days has led to ;never covering which increases the # of shares outstanding and can destroy a company according to the Save Canadian Mining studies.
The violations of trading fairness just keep growing and growing and the victims become more and more complacent. Very strange.
I like your comment under Jeff’s thread about manipulation in markets, he is quite clueless to think that manipulation is impossible when that is what his highly (Ivy) educated contemporaries strive for.
I listen to him but think his position on manipulation is wrong and dangerous to the clueless…
Hmmmmm…..
Impact, IPT, look away, look away, nothing happening here…
Blackrock, BRC, maybe a buy in the high $0.20s…
I don’t follow BRC but it seems like you could get it at a better price since it appears to have had only $2.2M at the end of the last quarter and should therefore be close to announcing another financing. Also, there didn’t seem to be much interest in the March financing. It was announced at “$4M to $7.9M” but closed just above the low end of that range at $4.38M. Does it deserve its market cap of $55M?
It was a technical observation I made on BRC not a fundamental, I have watched their chart for awhile and think a bump into the $0.30s again is very possible as that has been a common pattern for a short term trade.
After a glance at their properties on the website it does look worth watching and maybe it is worth its market cap but I’m not sure yet. Maybe it’s carrying a premium for being in Nevada and for Sprott’s interest and maybe I just don’t know enough about it’s potential. It’s resources appear to be all inferred so far, no M&I or P&P so there’s plenty of drilling to be done in addition to any further exploration. Let’s see if Sprott and/or Crescat step up for the next financing. It wouldn’t necessarily be a negative sign if they don’t but I’d consider it a vote of confidence if they do.
Dan. You got some yellow on your chart. Maybe some “white-out” will fix that blemish. 🙂
Haha… kill it before it grows!
It’s a good sign that the price is cutting into the $0.22 level of the recent financing’s warrants already, the main financing was at $0.17.
Looks like a good sign.
Screw the whiteout, hahaha… Costco selling silver eagles. Why would they limit purchases, unless there is low supply or high demand?
https://twitter.com/goldseek/status/1738154328035090784?s=46&t=-czpjsNirD4OUe294OHSkQ
My impression is there is no 4 month hold, one warrant can be converted into one share at $0.22… please correct me if I am wrong as that can be an expensive mistake, haha.
Dan, you are correct. There is no hold on this financing. The typical “4 months and a day” hold does not apply to these 20 million shares. In addition, who knows what portion of the 31 million shares from May’s financing are coming to market.
I posted this chart 5 weeks ago on the day that SILJ broke out vs GDX (the riskiest part of the sector broke out vs the safest). The action since is necessary for a bull market in the sector.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=SILJ%3AGDX&p=130&yr=0&mn=3&dy=0&id=p16782194391&a=1536143360